Re: Attestation SIG - orientation

Dave Thaler

I believe that all three of those are under the attestation SIG not the architecture SIG
as they are all attestation-specific.

The way that plugins get registered/loaded/initialized on the other hand is for the architecture SIG
since ideally the answer should be similar across different types of plugins, where attestation is just
one type of plugin.


-----Original Message-----
From: oesdk@... <oesdk@...> On Behalf Of Middleton, Dan via
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2020 10:37 AM
To: oesdk@...
Subject: [oesdk] Attestation SIG - orientation


I’m getting oriented in the attestation SIG and its purpose.
The previous minutes list 3 github issues and I just want to get the right context for them.

Is it the case that …
#2949 is an iteration on the current API
#2801 is design background on the current API
#2959 is requirements towards a new API

The minutes indicate that this forum will focus on immediate concerns whereas architectural design (like #2959 if I interpreted that correctly) will take place in the Architecture SIG?


Dan Middleton
Principal Engineer

Join { to automatically receive all group messages.